JUDGMENT :

Ritu Bahri, J.

1. This judgment shall dispose of CWP Nos.696 of 2014 and 18923 of 2014 together as common questions of law and facts are involved in both the petitions.

2. Petitioners in CWP No.696 of 2014 are seeking quashing of the order dated 04.12.2013 (Annxure P-18) passed by the Financial Commissioner, Haryana, dismissing their revision petition No.242/2013; order dated 19.10.2011 passed by the Assistant Collector, Ist Grade, Sohna during partition proceedings and the order dated 02.08.2012 (Annexure P- 10 Collectively), whereby partition proceedings were concluded.

3. On 15.11.2006, Jaipal filed an application for partition of 08 Kanals of land against Mir Singh, Satpal, Mool Chand, Rattan. Another application dated 19.09.2007 (Annexure P-1) was filed by Bharta against Mir Singh, Rattan Singh and Jaipal for partition of land measuring 189 Kanals 18 Marlas. In this application, Bharta had admitted possession of Mir Singh over a parcel of land. To the above application, Mir Singh filed written statement dated 14.11.2007 (Annexure P-2) admitting possession as mentioned by Bharta. Rattan Singh and Jaipal filed a common written statement dated 12.12.2007 (Annexure P-3). In