IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Manoj Bajaj, J.
Narender Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & others - Respondents
Criminal Revision No.1418 of 2017 (O&M)
Decided On : 23-06-2020
Injury - Criminal Trespass - Arms Act, 1959, Section 27, IPC Sections 307, 447, 323, 325, 34 - The court examined the nature of the injury suffered by the petitioner and concluded that a prima facie case for an offence punishable under Section 326 IPC was made out. The trial court rightly declined the application for framing charges under Sections 307/447 IPC but ordered the trial court to frame charges against the respondents under Section 326 IPC.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a dispute between two brothers over joint land holdings, resulting in violence and injuries to both parties. The petitioner sought framing of charges against the respondents for offences under Sections 307 and 447 IPC, in addition to Sections 323, 325, and 34 IPC.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that a prima facie case for an offence punishable under Section 326 IPC was made out against the respondents. It held that the trial court rightly declined the application for framing charges under Sections 307/447 IPC but ordered the trial court to frame charges against the respondents under Section 326 IPC.
Issues: The main issue was whether the injury suffered by the petitioner warranted charges under Sections 307 and 447 IPC, and if the respondents should be charged under Section 326 IPC instead of Section 325 IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court examined the nature of the injury and the weapon used, concluding that a prima facie case for an offence punishable under Section 326 IPC was made out. It also emphasized the limited scope of examination of prosecution material at the stage of framing charges.
Final Decision: The revision petition was disposed of, with the trial court ordered to frame charges against the respondents under Section 326 IPC.
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Bajaj, J.
1. Petitioner-Narender Singh has preferred this revision petition to challenge the order dated 10.01.2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, whereby his application for framing the charge against respondent Nos.2 and 3 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 307 and 447 IPC in the cross-case arising out from FIR No.111 dated 03.05.2016, under Sections 307, 506, 34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act, 1959, Police Station, Ladwa, District Kurukshetra, was dismissed.
2. According to the final report submitted by police, respondent Nos.2 and 3 were involved in commission of offences punishable under Sections 323, 325 and 34 IPC and the trial Court, as such, framed the charges against them.
3. The facts, in brief, leading to the revision petition are as under :-
(ii) On the next day, a cross version was recorded on the statement of Gurdev Singh son of Narender Singh against Charanjit Singh and Sarvjit Singh, both sons of Pritpal Singh, wherein they were indicted for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 325 and 34 IPC. In the cross version, it was alleged by Gurdev Singh that his father was having joint land with his uncles in the area of Village Niwarsi and Kheri Dabdalan. The land was joint which was partitioned for the purposes of cultivation. The land approximately 7½ acres situated on the road going from Kheri Dabdalan to Radour Yamunanagar was in their (complainant and his father) possession and was being cultivated for the last 13 years. It was narrated that on the previous day, i.e., 02.05.2016, they had cultivated the land for sowing sugar-cane crop and his uncle Pritpal Singh was asking for his share in the said fields in exchange to the land situated on the back side and the proposal was refused by them. According to him, the complainant and his father Narender Singh went to the fields in Kheri Dabdalan where his uncle Pritpal Singh, his son
Central Bureau of Investigation Versus K. Narayana Rao
Gangabhavani Versus Rayapati Venkat Reddy and others
Jai Narain Mishra and others Versus The State of Bihar
Mohinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab
P.Vijayan Versus State of Kerala and another
Rajender Singh Versus State of Haryana
Sajjan Kumar Versus Central Bureau of Investigation
Sheru and another Versus State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.