ANIL KSHETARPAL
Prabha Sehgal – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Sahoonja – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anil Kshetarpal, J. - By this judgment, Civil Revision Nos.6275, 6278 of 2014, 7492 and 7493 of 2015 shall stand disposed of. Counsel for the parties are also agreed that all these four revision can conveniently be disposed of by a common judgment.
Civil Revision No.6275 of 2014 and 6278 of 2014 have been filed by the landlords, whereas Civil Revision Nos. 7492 and 7493 of 2015 have been filed by tenant.
2. Dispute in both the revision petitions is with respect to two adjoining premises, one originally owned by Smt. Pritam Devi (daughter-inlaw) and second owned by Smt. Bhagwanti (mother-in-law). Shop numbers are 13 and 14, Leela Bhawan Market, Patiala. Both the shops were constructed separately and leased out in favour of tenant Subhash Sahoonja at Rs. 6000/- per month each for each shop with a provision for increase of rent by 15% after every three years. In both the petitions, eviction has been sought of the tenant on the grounds of non payment of rent, material structural alteration, resulting into material impairment in the value and utility of the building and bonafide requirement for the son of one of the co-owner-landlady-Smt. Prabha Sehgal.
3. Tenant contested the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.