SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 3745

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Parminder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Amarjit Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abhijeet Partap Singh Chaudhary, Adv., Nitin Thatai, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Raj Mohan Singh, J. - Petitioner has assailed the order dated 17.07.2017 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Ludhiana vide which application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC was dismissed by the Courts below.

2. Brief facts of the case are that plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering in peaceful possession of the plaintiff over the suit land/house. Along with the suit, an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was also filed. Plaintiff asserted that she along with her family is residing in the suit property measuring 315 sq. yards situated at Street No.12-C, Shaheed Karnail Singh Nagar, Back side Merado Colony, Ludhiana and house property measuring 150 sq. yards situated at Street No.12-D, Shaheed Karnail Singh Nagar, Back side Merado Colony, Ludhiana. The aforesaid properties shown in site plan A and B are connected with each other. It was alleged by the petitioner that defendant is sister-in-law (nanad) of the plaintiff and the plaintiff is in actual physical possession of the suit property without any interference of anyone since the date of her marriage with Tara Chand, who was actual owner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top