RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Rakesh – Appellant
Versus
Mamta Garg – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Raj Mohan Singh, J. - Vide this common order Civil Revision Nos.5588 and 5596 of 2017 are being decided.
2. Petitioner has assailed the order dated 01.08.2014 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Panipat vide which two applications were decided. Civil Revision No.5588 of 2017 has been preferred against the dismissal of application whereby permission to tender additional/supplementary affidavit along with 'CD' was declined. Whereas, Civil Revision No.5596 of 2017 has been arisen qua the rejection of prayer made in the application for restoration of electricity connection.
3. Since common facts are involved in both the revision petitions, therefore, for brevity facts are being noticed from Civil Revision No.5588 of 2017.
4. Plaintiff/petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction in respect of demised premises i.e. shop No.3 on the ground that he took the aforesaid shop on rent from the defendants @ Rs. 20,000/- per month and was paying the rent regularly in advance through cash as well as cheques without any default. Defendants did not issue any receipt despite demand. Plaintiff was paying electricity bill and other charges directly to the Department as per actual consump
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.