JUDGMENT

Ajay Tewari, J. (Oral) - This petition has been filed against an order dated 20.11.2014 declining an application of the petitioner whereby he prayed that certain documents placed on record by the respondents be de-exhibited. By the impugned order the trial court dismissed the application for immediate de-exhibition of the documents and held that the objections will be considered at the stage of final arguments.

2. Counsel for the appellants has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the matter of Girdhari Lal vs. Ritesh Mahajan and another, 2005 (2) R.C.R. (Rent) 426 . In that case, the respondents had placed photostat copies of certain documents on record as Ex.AW-4/1 to AW-4/7 and on an objection being made, the trial court had stated that the objections would be decided at the time of final arguments. Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon paragraph No.6 of that judgment where this Court held as follows:-

"Thus, in view of the observations in the above noted decisions, the Rent Controller was obliged to first decide the question of admissibility of the documents before making endorsement thereon. The approach of the Rent Controller to postpone the consideration of