HARI PAL VERMA
Pravin Kumar Budhia – Appellant
Versus
Amrit Kumar Budhia (since Deceased) And Others – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Hari Pal Verma, J. - The petitioner has filed the present civil revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 09.10.2017 (Annexure P-6) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar, whereby an application under Order 6, Rule 17 read with section 151 CPC for amendment of plaint filed by the respondent-plaintiffs during pendency of the suit, was allowed.
2. Briefly stated, the respondent-plaintiffs had filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the parties in the suit are owners in possession of their partitioned share as reflected in the site plans attached with the plaint. An oral family partition was effected between the parties and was acted upon accordingly in the year 1971. Thereafter, the memorandum of partition dated 30.11.1998 of the properties situated at Atma Niwas, Seth Hukam Chand Colony, G.T. Road, Jalandhar, double storey shop No. 859, Bazar Nauhrian- B-III/610/1 situated at Bazar Nauhiran, Jalandhar and three storey house No. NK-202, situated at Malkan Chowk, Charanjit Pura, Jalandhar, were partitioned.
3. The petitioner-defendant No. 1 filed his written statement, wherein it has been admitted that the pla
A. K. Gupta & Sons Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation
L.J. Leach and Company Limited Vs. Jardine Skinner and Company
M/s. Ganesh Trading Company Vs. Moji Ram
Mahila Ramkali Devi Vs. Nandram D through legal heirs
Pirgonda Hongonda Patil Vs. Kalgonda Shidgonda Patil
Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. K.K. Modi
S. Malla Reddy Vs. M/s Future Builders Cooperative Housing Society
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.