SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2387

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Desa Singh Through Lrs – Appellant
Versus
Sukhraj Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Hitesh Ghai, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Raj Mohan Singh, J. - Petitioner has preferred this revision petition against the order dated 18.10.2017 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Amritsar vide which the application filed by the plaintiff/petitioner under Order XI Rules 14 and 15 read with section 151 CPC for production of original agreement to sell dated 09.03.2013 was dismissed.

2. Plaintiff filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the plaintiff is owner in possession of the suit land and alleged sale deed dated 09.09.2013 is illegal, null and void. Consequential relief of permanent injunction was also sought, restraining the defendant from interfering in the possession of the plaintiff. Plaintiff claimed that he is owner in possession of the land measuring 3 kanals and the defendant entered into an agreement to sell to purchase the same from the Northern side of the khasra number to the extent of 3 kanals from the plaintiff vide agreement to sell dated 09.03.2013. From the said land, the plaintiff had already dug out the earth and this fact was also mentioned in the agreement to sell and consequently, a rate was agreed and settled between the parties at Rs. 11,25,000/- for the said land. The date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top