SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2459

ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
Neelam And Others – Appellant
Versus
Amit Kumar And Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Surinder Dagar, Advocate, Vinod Chaudhri, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Arun Kumar Tyagi, J. - The claimants Neelam-widow, Uday @ Omkar Parsadminor son, Chhaya-minor daughter, Jawahar Lal-father and Omwati @ Hariom Devi-mother of deceased-Shashi Kant have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gurgaon (for short 'the Tribunal') vide award dated 06.11.2012 passed in MACT Petition No.48 of 2012 titled as Neelam and others Vs. Amit Kumar and others on account of death of Shashi Kant due to injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident which took place on 23.04.2012.

2. The claimants filed the above-said claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the M.V. Act') on the averments that on 23.04.2012 at about 8:00 p.m. deceasedShashi Kant along with Rajesh Rana was standing at 17/18 red light old Delhi road for waiting of passengers. When the deceased was crossing the road for drinking water, motor cycle bearing registration No.KA-05-HJ-5587, owned by respondent No.2 and insured with respondent No.3, came from old Delhi road Sector 17/18 d

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top