RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Naresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Charanpreet Kaur @ Priti – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Raj Mohan Singh, J. - Vide this common order, above mentioned two regular second appeals arising out of judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below are being disposed of. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter being referred with the same status as before the trial Court.
2. The facts necessary to adjudicate the present lis are that the plaintiff-Charanpreet Kaur @ Priti and her two minor sons namely Rajat Kumar and Sumit Kumar had filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction inter alia stating that plaintiff No.1 is widow and plaintiffs No.2 and 3 are minor sons of late Sushil Kumar. The suit qua plaintiffs No.2 and 3 was filed through their mother (plaintiff No.1). It was stated that Sushil Kumar was joint owner in possession of the property along with defendants No.1 and 2 as fully detailed in head note A of the plaint. Phool Singh, father-in-law of plaintiff No.1 and grand-father of plaintiffs No.2 and 3 was joint owner in possession of the land as described in head note B of the plaint. Phool Singh had died, leaving behind the plaintiffs and defendants as legal heirs and the property in the hands of Phool Singh was ancestral property qua
Bachhaj Nahar vs. Nilima Mandal and another
Bharatha Matha and another vs. R. Vijaya Renganathan and others
G. Sekar vs. Geetha and seven others
H. Subba Rao vs. The Life Insurance Corporation of India and another
Hero Vinoth (minor) vs. Seshammal
Jinia Keotin and others vs. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi and others
R.K. Angousana Singh and others vs. Laisram Ningol Ningthemcha Ongbi Leinambi Devi and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.