JUDGMENT

Meenakshi I. Mehta, J. - Feeling aggrieved by the judgment dated 05.08.2019 as rendered by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Sonepat whereby respondent no. 2 Rahisu had been acquitted of the charges as levelled against him under Sections 365, 376, 506, 201 IPC, the appellant has preferred the present appeal.

2. Shorn and short of unnecessary details, the facts leading to the prosecution of respondent no.2 in the instant case, are that on 26.11.2016, respondent no.2 went to the house of the prosecutrix and asked her to give him Rs.1000/- or Rs.1500/- for the repair of his vehicle which had broken down near the pond of the village. She arranged for the said amount and went to the pond to hand over the same to respondent no.2 but he forcibly pulled her inside the car and put some cloth on her mouth and she fell unconscious. On regaining the consciousness, she found herself at an unknown place and respondent no.2 raped her while threatening that if she disclosed this incident to anyone, he would kill her as well as her family members. On the next day, respondent no.2, along with his relatives Sattar and Irshad, brought her to the Police Station S