JUDGMENT

Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) - All the above mentioned revision petitions shall stand disposed of by this common order as the parties involved are the same and the issue involved too is identical.

2. All the above mentioned revision petitions have been filed against the impugned order of the Rent Controller, Ludhiana as well as the Appellate Authority upholding the eviction order passed against the petitioner-tenant on the ground of non-payment of rent.

3. For the convenience of the Court, the facts are taken from Civil Revision-7058 of 2015.

4. The petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 was filed against the petitioner-tenant on the ground of arrears of rent and personal necessity. It was alleged in the eviction petition that the rent was @ Rs.3,000/- per month and the petitioner-tenant was in arrears of rent w.e.f. 20.1.2005. The Rent Controller passed the order of provisional rent by taking the rent as Rs.3,000/- per month. The petitioner-tenant did not tender the arrears of the assessed provisional rent. Accordingly, the ejectment order was passed against the petitioner-tenant. The petitioner-tenant chose to file appeal against the order