SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2849

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Mamta & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Neelam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate for the Appellants. None for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Raj Mohan Singh. J. (Oral) - Despite service none has appeared today. Even on the last date of hearing i.e. 30.09.2019, none was present for the respondent.

2. Notice of motion was issued on 06.03.2019. As per service report dated 25.03.2019, respondent has been duly served in person. Report has been authenticated by Ram Lai, Chowkidar. The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction challenging the sale deed dated 23.07.2012 executed by defendant No.2/grandmother namely Santra on the grounds of fraud, coercion and undue influence, insufficiency of stamp duty on the valuation of sale deed and on the ground of her being a coparcener in the suit land. Para No.2 of the plaint reads as under:-

"That upon demise of said Dharampal-grandfather of the plaintiff, the abovesaid Joint Family Property was inherited in equal shares by his heirs as co-parceners namely Smt. Santra (defendant No.2), and sons Satbir (defendant No.3) and Vikram. Thereafter, upon demise of said Vikram - other son of said Dharampal, his share was devolved upon his widow - Smt. Beenu Kumari and his mother - Smt. Santra (defendant No.2) in equal shares. Hence, Smt. Santra (defendant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top