DEVI PRASAD SINGH, ARVIND KUMAR TRIPATHI
Virendra Kumar Dixit – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Arvind Kumar Tripathi-II, J.—Petitioners Dr. Virendra Kumar Dixit and Smt. Alka Dixit purchased two plot Nos. 11 and 12, which fall in Khasrea Nos. 348, 349, 350 and 351 of village Faizullaganj, District Lucknow through registered sale-deeds. After execution of sale-deeds, the petitioners got possession and they constructed boundary wall covering these plots. The boundary of village Faizullaganj abuts the boundary of village Mohibullapur, District Lucknow. Certain land of village Mohibullapur was acquired in favour of Lucknow Development Authority for constructing Sector ‘B’ of Priyadarshani Colony. As per layout plan of Sector ‘B’, Priyadarshani Yojana, Sitapur Road, Lucknow (Annexure-1 to the Writ Petition), 6 meter wide road is situated in between the plots of petitioners’ and the chunk of land acquired in favour of Lucknow Development Authority.
2. The petitioners have pleaded that the personnel of Lucknow Development Authority were harassing the inhabitants of Village Faizullaganj on the pretext that the land acquired in favour of Lucknow Development Authority is part of Priyadarshani Nagar Yojana, Mohibullapur. Thus, the Society, ‘Jan Kalyan Lucknow Sahkari Gr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.