TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Gurmeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. - Instant writ petition is directed against the order dated 20.12.2018 (Annexure P-9) passed by the second respondent i.e. Enquiry Officer-cum-Superintending Engineer, OP Circle, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Karnal, in terms of which an application moved by the petitioners herein seeking sanction for engagement of a counsel to represent them in the enquiry proceedings, has been declined.
2. Brief facts emanating from the pleadings on record may be noticed.
3. Petitioners are serving as Junior Engineers/Junior Engineers-I under the respondent-Nigam. FIR number 389 dated 26.10.2016 was registered at Police Station Farakpur, District Yamunanagar under Sections 409, 411, 420 and 120-B IPC and Section 137 of Indian Electricity Act as also Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Even though petitioners were not specifically named in the FIR but during the course of investigation, culpability of the petitioners also cropped up and allegations against them were as regards mis-utilization of the Nigam's material and having indulged in corrupt practices. Petitioners were arrested and thereafter they were placed under suspension vide offic
C.L. Subramaniam vs. Collector of Customs Cochin
Crescent Dyes and Chemicals Ltd. vs. Ram Naresh Tripathi
D.H.B.V.N.L. Vidyut Nagar, Hisar & others vs. Yashvir Singh Gulia
Indian Overseas Bank vs. Indian Overseas Bank Officers Association and Another
J.K. Aggarwal vs. Haryana Seeds Development Corporation LTD. and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.