ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
Gurmail Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, J.
1. Petitioners-Gurmail Singh and Kusalia Devi have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No. 8 dated 28.01.2018 registered under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “the IPC”) at Police Station Mahilpur, District Hoshiarpur along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom in view of the compromise effected with respondent No. 2-Vijay Kumar.
2. The above said FIR was registered on statement of respondent No. 2-Vijay Kumar. In his statement-Vijay Kumar alleged that on 24.01.2018 his father Ajit Ram left the house on his scooter and told him that he was going to Mahilpur. After sometime his father came back and went to the upper room and vomited on which he and his mother asked him as to what had happened on which his father took out a bottle from his pocket containing Salfas tablets and told him that he was harrassed by his (Vijay Kumar's) wife-Sandeep Kaur. his father-in-law Gurmail Singh and his mother-in-law Kausalia Devi due to which had consumed three salfas tablets. His uncle Harminder Singh and Tarlochan Ram also reached the spot. The
Amalendu Pal vs. State of West Bengal
Kishori Lal vs. State of M.P. (2007) 10 SCC 797
Kishangiri Mangalgiri Goswami vs. State of Gujarat
Kulwinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others
Narinder Singh vs. State of Punjab
Randhir Singh vs. State of Punjab
Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.