SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 188

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, J.
Gurmail Singh and Another – Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and Another – Respondents
CRM-M No. 29791 of 2019
Decided On : 02-03-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Dr. Naresh Kaushik.
For the Respondents: Mr. P.S. Walia, Mr. Naveen Siwach.

The court established the power of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings based on settlement between the parties in cases of overwhelmingly and predominantly private character, and emphasized the need for the essential ingredients of the offence to be satisfied.

Headnote:

ABETMENT - Criminal Procedure - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 306, Section 34 - Summary: The court quashed the FIR under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the IPC at Police Station Mahilpur, District Hoshiarpur, based on the compromise between the parties. The court analyzed the provisions of Section 306 and Section 107 of the IPC and cited relevant case law to establish that the essential ingredients of the offence punishable under Section 306 were not satisfied in the present case. The court also highlighted the power of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings based on settlement between the parties in cases of overwhelmingly and predominantly private character. The court found that the compromise was genuine, voluntary, and without coercion, and therefore, quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No. 8 dated 28.01.2018 registered under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Mahilpur, District Hoshiarpur, based on a compromise with the respondent. The deceased allegedly committed suicide due to harassment caused by the respondent's wife, father, and mother. The petitioners argued that the offence under Section 306 of the IPC was not made out and the FIR was an abuse of process of law.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the essential ingredients of the offence punishable under Section 306 of the IPC were not satisfied in the present case. It also noted that the compromise between the parties was genuine, voluntary, and without coercion. The court further observed that the possibility of conviction of the petitioners was remote and bleak, and continuation of the case would put the petitioners to great oppression and extreme injustice.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners could be said to have abetted the commission of suicide by the deceased, and whether the compromise between the parties warranted the quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the provisions of Section 306 and Section 107 of the IPC and cited relevant case law to establish that the essential ingredients of the offence punishable under Section 306 were not satisfied in the present case. The court also highlighted the power of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings based on settlement between the parties in cases of overwhelmingly and predominantly private character.

Final Decision: The court quashed FIR No. 8 dated 28.01.2018 registered under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the IPC at Police Station Mahilpur, District Hoshiarpur, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, based on the compromise between the parties.

JUDGMENT :

ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, J.

1. Petitioners-Gurmail Singh and Kusalia Devi have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No. 8 dated 28.01.2018 registered under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “the IPC”) at Police Station Mahilpur, District Hoshiarpur along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom in view of the compromise effected with respondent No. 2-Vijay Kumar.

2. The above said FIR was registered on statement of respondent No. 2-Vijay Kumar. In his statement-Vijay Kumar alleged that on 24.01.2018 his father Ajit Ram left the house on his scooter and told him that he was going to Mahilpur. After sometime his father came back and went to the upper room and vomited on which he and his mother asked him as to what had happened on which his father took out a bottle from his pocket containing Salfas tablets and told him that he was harrassed by his (Vijay Kumar's) wife-Sandeep Kaur. his father-in-law Gurmail Singh and his mother-in-law Kausalia Devi due to which had consumed three salfas tablets. His uncle Harminder Singh and Tarlochan Ram also reached the spot. They arranged the vehicle and took his father to Hospital. On the way, his father also took out suicide note from the pocket of his shirt and handed over the same to him. His father died on 27.01.2018. In the suicide note, his father implicated his (Vijay Kumar's) wife-Sandeep Kaur, father-in-law Gurmail Singh and mother-in-law-Kusalia Devi. His wife-Sandeep Kaur, father-in-law Gurmail Singh and mother-in-law-Kusalia Devi had filed false case under the Prohibition of Dowry Act, 1961 against him, his father and other members of the family. His father committed suicide due to above said case filed by his wife-Sandeep Kaur and harassment by his wife-Sandeep Kaur, father-in-law-Gurmail Singh and mother-in-law-Kusalia Devi.

3. The petitioners have filed the present petition for quashing of the FIR on the ground that offence under Section 306 of the IPC is not made out and FIR is abuse of process of law and liable to be quashed and also on the ground that after intervention of respectable persons, the matter has been amicably compromised between the parties whereby they resolved their differences and decided that criminal complaint filed by Sandeep Kaur will be withdrawn and respondent No. 2 will support for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

4. Vide order dated 21.11.2019, Co-ordinate Bench of this Court directed the private parties to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 27.11.2019 for recording of their statements with regard to compromise/settlement and directed the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to submit a report before 25.02.2020 regarding the genuineness and voluntary nature of the compromise.

5. In compliance of the above said order, learned Sessions Judge, Hoshiarpur has recorded the statements of both the parties and submitted report dated 06.12.2019. The relevant part of the same reads as under:-

    “........It is submitted that trial is pending in FIR No. 8 dated 28.1.2018, under Sections 306, 34 IPC, Police Station Mahilpur, against Gurmail Singh and Kaushalya Devi under Section 306 IPC and it is fixed for prosecution evidence. So far as accused Sandeep Kaur is concerned, she is kept in Column No. 2 of the Challan Report. The report of Illaqa Magistrate has been received vide letter No. 601 dated 6.12.2019 according to which, arrest warrants of Sandeep Kaur were issued but the proceedings against accused Sandeep Kaur had been stayed by the Hon’ble High Court vide order dated 16.7.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. M. No. 18240 of 2019. Till date Sandeep Kaur has not been declared proclaimed offender.

Statement of investigating officer ASI Ram Lal, No. 619/Hpr of Police Station Mahilpur, was recorded, who has stated that Gurmail Singh, Kaushalya Devi and Sandeep Kaur are not involved in any other case. He has further stated th

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top