SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 100

JASWANT SINGH, JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Hamdard Engineering through its Sole Proprietor Harinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
City Union Bank Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal.

JUDGMENT :

JASWANT SINGH, J.

1. Petitioner-Firm has filed the present writ petition seeking quashing of demand notice dated 03.07.2019 (Annexure P-1) issued under section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short “SARFAESI Act, 2002”) alongwith possession notice dated 18.09.2019 (Annexure P-2) issued under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 on the ground that it is ready to settle the dispute by way of one time settlement as the petitioner-firm has a prospective buyer who has given its consent to purchase the property.

2. We have heard learned counsel for petitioner and have perused the paper book. However, we are of the view that present petition is liable to be dismissed.

3. Admittedly, the petitioner-firm is a defaulter of respondent-Bank and as on 03.07.2019 an amount of Rs. 7,12,90,740/- is outstanding towards it as against a total loan of 7.05 crores taken by it at various points of time whose details have been reproduced at page 5 of the paper-book. It is further not in dispute that the petitioner-firm has been declared as a Non-Performing Asset (for short “NPA”) on 30.09.2018 and not even a s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top