SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 472

AVNEESH JHINGAN
ARUN CHOPRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Gaurav Kalsi, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. Monika Jalota, DAG, Punjab

JUDGMENT :

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.

1. The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

2. This petition is filed seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2-Poonam (sister-in-law of the deceased) in FIR No. 111, dated 28th September, 2018, under Sections 306 read with 34 IPC registered at Police Station Maqboolpura.

3. The FIR was at the instance of Arun Chopra (petitioner). It was alleged that his son Vishal Chopra solemnized love marriage three years back with Kavita dauther of Shiv Dayal. After marriage, his son was residing in a flat at Amritsar. An information was received that his son had committed suicide. On receiving the information, he alongwith his family members reached Amritsar where the dead body of his son was lying on a bed and curtain was hanging on the ceiling fan.

4. Poonam applied for anticipatory bail before the Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar. The prayer was opposed. It was argued that the deceased had sent an audio WhatsApp message on mobile No. 70870-54672 stating that he is leaving this world due to interference of his in-laws family. On 1st November, 2019, Poonam was granted interim bail subject t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top