SUVIR SEHGAL
Gurinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gobind Kaur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUVIR SEHGAL, J.
1. Instant revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 15.01.2021, Annexure P-3, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, whereby application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the Punjab National Bank (for short - “the Bank”) - respondent No.4 has been allowed and order dated 15.04.2021, Annexure P-4, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, whereby appeal against the said order has been dismissed.
2. Facts, leading to the filing of the petition, are that late Tarlochan Singh, father of the plaintiff-petitioner, was allotted plot No.296-D in Model Town Extension, Ludhiana and construction of the ground floor on the plot was raised from the funds withdrawn by the petitioner from his GPF account with the Punjab Agricultural University, where he was employed. Tarlochan Singh expired intestate on 14.12.2007. He was carrying on the business of nuts and bolts under the name and style of M/s Shine Industrial Corporation as its proprietor, which was taken over by his younger son, Harpreet Singh respondent No.2. The property continued to b
Mardia Chemicals Limited vs. Union of India and others 2004 (4) SCC 311
Nahar Industrial Enterprises Limited vs. Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation 2009 (8) SCC 646
Bank of Baroda vs. Ranjan Chetia and others 2014 (64) RCR(Civ) 634
T. Arivandandam vs T.V. Satyapal and another 1977 (4) SCC 467
ITC Limited vs. Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (1998) 2 SCC 70
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.