RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Arun Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Kamal Sharma – Respondent
ORDER :
Rajbir Sehrawat, J.
1. This regular second appeal is filed by the plaintiff challenging the concurrent finding recorded by the courts below, whereby the suit for specific performance of an agreement, filed by the plaintiff, was dismissed. For the convenience, the parties are being referred to herein as plaintiff and the defendant; as they were described in the original suit.
2. The fact in brief, as mentioned in the judgment of the lower appellate court are; that the plaintiff/appellant herein had filed a suit for specific performance claiming that the vendor Mukesh Chand son of Roop Chand had executed an agreement to sell dated 07.05.2007 in favour of the plaintiff qua the sale of portion of his share in house No. 475/1, Ward No. 3, Mahavirpura, New Railway Road, Guru-gram, for an amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- and the possession of the same was also handed over to him. The entire amount of consideration was paid to the vendor. But, the vendor expired. Thereafter, the legal notice was served upon the legal heirs of the vendor Mukesh Chand. But, they refused to execute the sale deed. Accordingly the suit was filed.
3. The parties led their respective evidence. After considering the e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.