MANOJ BAJAJ
Arjun Bhanot – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manoj Bajaj, J. - The petitioners have filed their respective fourth and third petition under Section 438 read with Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 348 dated 06.10.2014 under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 201 Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Bathinda, who apprehend their arrest by Police.
2. The above FIR was registered on the basis of the complaint given by complainant, namely, Sharan Dass (respondent No.2) and allegations as noticed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda in the order dated 10.11.2014 are as under:-
"Brief facts of this case are that FIR in question was registered on the basis of application moved by complainant Sharan Dass on behalf of M/s Gurdas Agro Pvt. Ltd. Bathinda. It is revealed in the application that the complainant Gurdas Agro Pvt. Ltd. is having dealing with the UCO Bank, Branch Amrik Singh Road, Bathinda. The accused named in the FIR (Bank Officers) in connivance have sanctioned loan of Rs. 6.50 Crores to M/s Arjun Mai Retail Holding Pvt. Ltd. Corporate Branch Ludhiana, without any document and they have withdrawn Rs. 4.50
Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki vs. State of Gujarat and others
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia etc. vs. The State of Punjab 1980 AIR(SC) 1632
Kalvan Chandra Sarkar vs. Raiesh Rani an (a) Pappu Yadav. 2005 (2) SCC 42
M.K. Kushalappa and another vs. KJ. Georse and others". 2017 (4) RCR(Cri) 140
Rani Dudeia vs. State of Harvana. 2017 (13) SCC 555
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.