SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1479

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
H.S. Madaan, J.
Sonia - Appellant
Versus
Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission - Respondent
CWP No. 7558 of 2021 (O&M)
Decided On : 26-08-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ishaan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the Appellant; Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate and Mr. Rohit Kaushik, Advocate for the respondent, for the Respondent

The court emphasized that the show cause notice issued to the petitioner did not provide cause of action for the writ petition and dismissed the petition.

Headnote:

Concealment - Employment Reversion - Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission - [Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India] - [Regulation 14 of the Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission (Officer and Employees Condition of Service) Regulations, 2016] - The court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner against the Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission's decision to revert her to the post of Assistant Director (Economics) after she was appointed as Deputy Director (Economics) on a permanent basis. The court found that the show cause notice issued to the petitioner was not without jurisdiction and did not provide cause of action for the writ petition. The court also noted that the petitioner's attempt to seek immunity from action under the cover of an interim order was not valid.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, Sonia, filed a writ petition against the Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission's decision to revert her to the post of Assistant Director (Economics) after being appointed as Deputy Director (Economics) on a permanent basis. The petitioner alleged that the show cause notice issued to her was stigmatic and sought acceptance of the writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the show cause notice issued to the petitioner did not provide cause of action for the writ petition and dismissed the petition. The court also noted that the petitioner's attempt to seek immunity from action under the cover of an interim order was not valid.

Issues: The issues revolved around the validity of the show cause notice issued to the petitioner and the maintainability of the writ petition.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the show cause notice did not provide cause of action for the writ petition and dismissed the petition. The court also noted that the petitioner's attempt to seek immunity from action under the cover of an interim order was not valid.

Final Decision: The writ petition was found to be not maintainable and was dismissed accordingly.

JUDGMENT

H. S. Madaan, J. - Petitioner - Sonia, aged 31 years, d/o Sh. Jai Narayan r/o House No. 709/29, Tilak Nagar, Rohtak, Haryana, has brought the instant civil writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, against respondent Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission, Panchkula, praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of decision/notice dated 24.3.2021 (Annexure P-14), vide which respondent-Commission has decided to revert the petitioner to the post of Assistant Director (Economics), at the same level at which the petitioner was working on contract basis, besides craving for issuance of a writ in the nature of prohibition restraining the respondent from reverting the petitioner to the earlier post and for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to continue on the post of Deputy Director (Economics), on the basis of her appointment letter dated 24.12.2018 (Annexure P-10) etc.

2. Inter alia in the writ petition, it is contended that respondent - Commission had issued advertisement/notice in the year 2014, inviting applications for the post of Assistant Director (Economics), in the Commission, on contract basis for a period of one year, which could be extended from time to time subject to performance. The petitioner being fully eligible for the said post had applied for the same and she was selected for the post after following due selection process and was posted as Assistant Director (Economics) on contract basis on 18.11.2014. The petitioner accordingly joined as such on 20.11.2014. The petitioner had been appointed as Assistant Director (Economics) on contract basis against the post of Deputy Director (Economics) and was duly allotted the work of the post of Deputy Director (Economics) by the respondent - Commission.

3. That subsequently on 13.12.2018, the respondent- Commission had framed the Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission (Officer and Employees Condition of Service) Regulations, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Regulations'). Regulation 14 of the said Regulations lays down the eligibility criterion for the short-term contract appointments. A perusal of Appendix 'A' and 'D' to the Regulations, goes to show that it does not lay down terms and conditions/eligibility criteria for the post of Assistant Director (Economics), whereas it lays down qualifications, experience and recruitment policy for the post of Deputy Director (Economics); that since the petitioner was duly qualified for the post of Deputy Director (Economics) and also had requisite experience to be appointed on that post by way of permanent absorption as per provisions of Appendix 'A' and 'D”, the petitioner applied to the respondent - Commission for her absorption on the post of Deputy Director (Economics) on permanent basis in the year December 2018; that after following due procedure, a decision was taken in the 91st meeting of the Commission held on 24.12.2018 and consequently, the petitioner was ordered to be permanently absorbed on the vacant post of Deputy Director (Economics) w.e.f. 24.12.2018; that she was issued appointment letter on that very date and she had submitted her joining report to the respondent -Commission on 24.12.2018 itself.

4. The petitioner has been serving as Deputy Director (Economics), on permanent basis since the year 2018 and she had been given appreciation letters on various occasions; that her such appointment/absorption was given approval by the Haryana Assembly also.

5. However, on 24.3.2021, the respondent - Commission issued a show cause notice to the petitioner in an arbitrary manner for her reversion to the post of Assistant Director (Economics), on the ground that in the application dated 15.12.2018 submitted by the petitioner seeking permanent absorption in the service of Commission, the petitioner had concealed the fact that she was working on contract basis and while putting up the application fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top