SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1250

RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Dinesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shrey Goel, Advocate, B.S. Virk, Advocate, Anuj Garg, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. - Matter has been taken up through video conferencing via Webex facility in the light of the Pandemic Covid-19 situation and as per instructions.

CRM-21012-2021

2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and CRM-M-12072-2021 is taken on Board today itself.

CRM-M-12072-2021

3. Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of FIR No.259 dated 21.06.2018, under Sections 323, 406, 498-A IPC, 1860, registered at Police Station Sector-9A, District Gurugram and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 17.03.2020 (Annexure P-2).

4. Fir in question was got registered by complainantrespondent No.2 namely, Mishma Kaushik and the investigation commenced thereon. However, with the intervention of respectables, finally the parties arrived at settlement and they resolved their inter se dispute, which is apparent from Compromise Deed, annexed as Annexure P-2. On the basis of the compromise, the petitioners are praying that continuation of these proceedings would be a futile exercise and an abuse of process of the Court and thus, the FIR in question and all the subsequent pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top