SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 910

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Manjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Alka Chatrath, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate, for the Appellant.

ORDER

Anil Kshetarpal, J. - Through this writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 17.03.2021 vide which the petitioner has been removed from service. The question which arises for consideration is 'whether the petitioner, who got employment on the post of ETT Teacher on the strength of Junior Basic Training (JBT) from Bihar Pradesh Shiksha Parishad, Shripalpur, can be permitted to continue when it is established that the institute itself does not exist?

2. The petitioner on being appointed as an ETT Teacher joined on 29.12.2006. She claims that she has completed two years Diploma in Elementary Education from Bihar Pradesh Shiksha Parishad, Shripalpur, through Oxford College, situated in Jalandhar. In 2020, the petitioner was issued a chargesheet under Rule 5 (V-IX) of the Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970, (in short 'the Rules') alleging that he does not possess the requisite qualification as the Bihar Pradesh Shiksha Parishad, Shripalpur, does not even exist. The petitioner filed a reply and thereafter, the Principal, Government Senior

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top