SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 915

MEENAKSHI I MEHTA
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sunil Kumar Nehra, Advocate, Samarth Sagar, Advocate, Gobind Tanwar, Advocate, Kanwal Goyal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Meenakshi I. Mehta, J. - By way of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought the indulgence of this Court for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing Advertisement No.3 of 2021 (Annexure P-4) to the extent of its not providing the age relaxation to the aspirants, belonging to the Economically Weaker Sections (here-in-after referred to as 'the EWS'), for the posts, except the post of the Deputy Superintendent of Police ( for short 'the DSP'), advertised thereby as well as the notification dated 03.02.2021 (Annexure P-9) so far as it does not provide the age relaxation to the candidates of the said category for the other posts while granting this benefit to them for the posts of the Police and Prisons Personnel and he has further prayed for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant relaxation of 5 years in the maximum age to the candidates belonging to the EWS category for the other posts as well and also directing respondent No.3-the Haryana Public Service Commission (here-in-after referred to as 'the HPSC') to accept his application-form for the posts advertised vide Annexure P-4 and to treat him as eligibl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top