SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 689

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Sarabjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral). - Present petition has been filed seeking direction that the petitioner should not be replaced with another set of employees keeping in view the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.8746 of 2003 titled as 'Hargurpratap Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others', decided on 07.11.2003.

2. The first question, which needs to be decided is, as to whether the present writ petition is maintainable or not.

3. No appointment order appointing the petitioner by the Nagar Panchayat Bhagat Bhai, District Bathinda has been placed on record by the petitioner to show that she is an employee of the said Nagar Panchayat so as to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has attached a certificate (Annexure P-2), which has been given by the Nagar Panchayat Bhagat Bhai, District Bathinda to show that she is working with the said authorities.

5. A bare perusal of the said order would show that the petitioner is in fact an employee of Shri Ganesh Co-operative L&C Society Ltd. Maur, District Bathinda and is only posted with the Nagar Panchayat Bhagat Bhai, District Bathinda as an ou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top