HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Sarabjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral). - Present petition has been filed seeking direction that the petitioner should not be replaced with another set of employees keeping in view the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.8746 of 2003 titled as 'Hargurpratap Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others', decided on 07.11.2003.
2. The first question, which needs to be decided is, as to whether the present writ petition is maintainable or not.
3. No appointment order appointing the petitioner by the Nagar Panchayat Bhagat Bhai, District Bathinda has been placed on record by the petitioner to show that she is an employee of the said Nagar Panchayat so as to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has attached a certificate (Annexure P-2), which has been given by the Nagar Panchayat Bhagat Bhai, District Bathinda to show that she is working with the said authorities.
5. A bare perusal of the said order would show that the petitioner is in fact an employee of Shri Ganesh Co-operative L&C Society Ltd. Maur, District Bathinda and is only posted with the Nagar Panchayat Bhagat Bhai, District Bathinda as an ou
A.P. SRTC and others vs. G. Srinivas Reddy and others (2006) 3 SCC 674
Air India Statutory Corp. vs. United Labour Union (1997) 9 SCC 377
Hargurpratap Singh vs. State of Punjab (2007) 13 SCC 292
Haryana SEB vs. Suresh (1999) 3 SCC 601
Municipal Corporation of Grater Mumbai vs. K.V. Shramik Sangh and others (2002) 4 SCC 609
Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs. Union of India and others (2006) 12 SCC 233
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.