SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 630

ALKA SARIN
Mrs. Vijay Lata – Appellant
Versus
Sh. Rajiv Arora – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mrs. Vijay Lata, Advocate, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Alka Sarin, J. - This is a petition under Section 340 read with Section 195(l)(b)(i) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for granting sanction to initiate criminal proceedings against the respondent for the offence of knowingly filing a false affidavit (perjury) in CWP. No. 1986 of 1993, cheating, forgery and defamation and for directing the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurukshetra for further proceeding in Criminal Complaint No.231 of 2003.

2. The facts of the case disclose how the criminal justice system is being clogged with unnecessary litigation and how the Courts are being burdened with cases which have already attained finality, even during trying times. The petitioner has approached this Court for the fifth time for seeking the same relief under the same provisions of law by cleverly re-wording some portions of her petition. She has been unsuccessful on the earlier four occasions.

3. The facts have been culled out from the order dated 16.03.2020 (Annexure P-26) passed by this Court in CRM-M-10355-2020. The present petition itself is vaguely worded and the petitioner has, for reasons best known to her, concealed several orders passed by this Court as well as the civi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top