SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 608

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited – Appellant
Versus
Gurdeep Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.Sidhant Bhonsle, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Anil Kshetarpal, J. (Oral). - The defendants are assailing the correctness of the order passed by the learned Trial Court while dismissing their application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, to reject the plaint. Learned Trial Court has held as under:-

"5 I have heard the contentions of counsel for the applicants and counsel for the respondent and have gone through the material placed on record in the light of above said contentions of learned counsel for the plaintiff and defendants. As can be culled from the judicial record, the present suit has been filed by the plaintiff challenging the demand of Rs. 1,51,310/- raised by the defendant vide bill dated 14.10.2019. Further the plaintiff has also assailed the order of Chairperson, Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum, Patiala by virtue whereof the application of the plaintiff has been rejected vide order dated 25.02.2020 and further memo no. 726 dated 01.06.2020 issued by defendant no.3 by virtue whereof plaintiff was asked to deposit the remaining outstanding amount. Section 145 of the Electricity Act 2003 bars the jurisdiction of the Civil Court only in respect of matters in which an Assessing Officer referred to in section 126 or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top