RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam – Appellant
Versus
Harjit Singh – Respondent
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J.
The short but important question of law that falls for consideration of this court in the instant writ petition is, whether the civil court jurisdiction under Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short the Act) for determining any issue arising under Section 56 of the Act is barred or it would be restricted only qua the issues arising out of any order passed under Sections 126 and 127 of the Act.
Facts first. The present writ petition is directed against the order dated 3.12.2012 (Annexure P-1), passed by the learned Civil Judge (S.D.) Naraingarh, whereby the learned Civil Judge issued direction to the petitioner to restore the electric connection, subject to deposit of an amount of 40% of bill amount by the plaintiff within 15 days. The impugned order came to be passed by the learned Civil Judge in an application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC in the suit for declaration. The suit was filed by the present respondent challenging the action of the petitioner, disconnecting his electric supply in alleged default of payment of electricity charges. The respondent alleged that the electricity bill (Annexure P-2) ra
Haryana State Electricity Board vs. Mam Chand
Dheeraj Singh vs. B.S.E.S. Yamuna Power Limited
Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission vs. Reliance Energy Limited and Others
Accounts Officers, Jharkhand State Electricity Board and Others vs. Anwar Ali
Padmausundrao Rao and Another vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others
PSEB, Patiala and Others vs. M/s. Guru Nanak Agriculture Engineering Works and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.