SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 96

ANOOP CHITKARA
Gindi Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. J.K. Singla, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Gill, DAG

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

23

30.01.2022

Sadar Mansa, District Mansa

15 of NDPS Act

1. The petitioner apprehending arrest for violating the above-mentioned provisions of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) per the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.

2. As per paragraph 8 of the bail application, the petitioner has following criminal history:

Sr. No.

FIR No.

Date

Offences

Police Station

1.

147

16.08.2006

15 of NDPS Act

Sadar Mansa

2.

119

03.07.2014

21, 29 of NDPS Act

City Sunam

3.

52

05.05.2010

15 of NDPS Act

Jhunir

4.

30

16.07.2020

21 of NDPS Act

Kabarwala

5.

108

06.09.2017

15 of NDPS Act

Sadar Mansa

6.

120

13.11.2017

15 of NDPS Act

Jhunir

3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the custodial investigation would serve no purpose whatsoever, and the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.

4.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top