SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 99

ANOOP CHITKARA
Satnam Singh @ Sandy – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr.Ankit Bishnoi, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Rehatbir Singh Mann, DAG

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

246

24.09.2021

Division No.6, Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana

379-B, 120-B, 411 (added later on) and 34 (now deleted) IPC, 1860 And Sections 25, 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (now deleted)

1. The petitioner, incarcerating upon his arrest in the FIR captioned above, came up before this Court under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail.

2. In paragraph 19 of the petition, it is declared that the accused has no criminal history.

3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire money stands recovered and in the interregnum the matter has been compromised between all the three accused and the complainant. He further submits that this Court had granted bail to one of the co-accused, namely, Sandeep Singh @ Seepa vide order dated 03.02.2022 passed in CRM-M-2656 of 2022 and the petitioner is also entitled on bail on the grounds of parity because he has no criminal history. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner further contends that the pre-trial incarceration would cause

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top