SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 102

ANOOP CHITKARA
Mangal Singh @ Manga – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. B.S. Saroha, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajat Gautam, DAG

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

119

11.06.2021

Ismailabad, District Kurukshetra

308, 323, 34, 365, 506 & 511 IPC (Section 325 IPC added later on)

1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.

2. As per bail application and the response of the State, the petitioner has following criminal history :

Sr. No.

FIR No.

Police Station

Offences

status

1

147 dated 27.11.2021

Ismailabad

341, 323, 324, 506 & 34 IPC

Acquitted vide order dated 23.4.2014

2

103 dated 14.07.2013

Ismailabad

18-61-85 of NDPS Act

Acquitted vide order dated 04.11.2015

3

235 dated 25.09.2016

Pehowa

148, 149, 323, 506 & 34 IPC

Acquitted vide order dated 05.02.2019

4

99 dated 22.02.2017

Pehowa

148, 149, 323 & 506 IPC

Acquitted vide order dated 24.10.2010

5

158 dated 25.07.2020

Ismailabad

61-1-14 of Excise Act

P.C. 07.09.2020

3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the custodial investiga

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top