Rani vs State of Punjab - 2022 Supreme(P&H) 64

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(P&H) 64

ANOOP CHITKARA
Rani – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. GBS Dhillon, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Harsimar Singh Sitta, Adv

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
80	22.11.2021	Aur, District SBS Nagar	21 and 22 NDPS Act

1. The petitioner under arrest for violating the provisions as mentioned above of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), per the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail on the ground that the quantity of contraband is less than commercial and rigours of S. 37 of NDPS Act do not apply.

2. In paragraph 15 of the petition, it is declared that the accused has no criminal history.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance upon the following judgments:-

Sr.No.	Citation	Title of case	Date of decision
1.	2004(2) RCR Criminal 137	Sajan Abraham v. State of Kerala	26.02.2004
2.	2015(25) RCR Criminal 816	Saleem Mohd. v. State of Punjab	04.11.2015
3.	2019(1) Law Herald 69	Nitin Rajput v. State of Punjab	19.11.2018
4.	2019(2) Law Herald 1030	Shakti v. State of U.T.	15.03.2018

He contends that the custodial investigation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(P&H) 64

ANOOP CHITKARARani – AppellantVersusState of Punjab – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

ANOOP CHITKARA
Rani – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent