SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 79

ANOOP CHITKARA
Daya Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Prashant Singh Chauhan.
For the Respondent: Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

40

19.01.2022

Kasola, District Rewari

20 NDPS Act and later on added Section 27-A NDPS

1. The petitioner apprehending arrest for violating the above-mentioned provisions of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) per the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.

2. In paragraph 16 of the petition, it is declared that the accused has no criminal history.

3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the custodial investigation would serve no purpose whatsoever, and the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.

4. On instructions from the Investigating Officer, learned counsel appearing for State opposes the bail and submits that grant of bail encourages the drug peddlers, and the drug menace is spreading day by day. He has further submitted that in case this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, then State be given liberty to seek cancellation of bail

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top