ANOOP CHITKARA
Manpreet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anoop Chitkara, J.
This order shall dispose of two criminal petitions as mentioned above. For the sake of brevity, facts have been taken from CRM-M-32745-2021 titled as Manpreet Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others.
The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 Cr.PC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the victims.
2. The gist of the allegations against the petitioners is that the complainant (respondent No.2) made a statement before the police and based on that statement, the police registered the FIR captioned above. Similarly, on the statement of petitioner No.3, cross version registered against respondent No.1 and other petitioners in CRM-M-37546-2021. Needless to mention all the details and it is sufficient to say that the parties have entered into a compromise.
3. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the injured (both parties) have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the injured
Shakuntala Sawhney vs. Kaushalya Sawhney, (1979) 3 SCR 639
Ram Prasad v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Suresh Babu v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Dimpey Gujraj v Union Territory
State of Rajasthan v. Shambhu Kewat
Narinder Singh &Ors. vs. State of Punjab &Ors. (2014) 6 SCC 466
State of Maharashtra vs. Vikram Anantrai Doshi
Parbatbhai Aahir v State of Gujarat
Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association v State of Himachal Pradesh
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.