Kalpana Vats vs State of Haryana - 2022 Supreme(P&H) 42

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(P&H) 42

ANOOP CHITKARA
Kalpana Vats – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Rajat Gautam, DAG, Haryana., Mr. Sudhir Rana, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
108	27.07.2021	Rewari Sadar, District Rewari	306/34 IPC

CRM-31978-2021

Application is allowed, as prayed for.

Documents at Annexures P-9 & P-10, are taken on record.

Main case

1. The petitioners apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above have come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.

2. As per bail petition and the response of the State, petitioner No.2 has following criminal history:

Sr. No.	FIR No.	Date	Offences under Section	Police Station
1	192	2021	420 IPC	Khol
2	354	2019	379B, 384 & 342 IPC	DLF, Gurugram

3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioners further contends that the custodial investigation would serve no purpose whatsoever, and the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioners and family. Learned counsel for the petitioners further argued that although petitioner No.1 had two criminal cases against her but in one case i.e. FIR No.354/2019, she has been acquitted. In the other case i.e. FI

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(P&H) 42

ANOOP CHITKARAKalpana Vats – AppellantVersusState of Haryana – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

ANOOP CHITKARA
Kalpana Vats – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent