ANOOP CHITKARA
Harpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 14 | 16.02.2021 | Ghanie Ke Bangar, District Gurdaspur | 452, 307, 324, 323, 427, 148 & Police District Batala, 149 and Sections 25/57 of Arms Act |
1. The petitioners, who have arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC to quash the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the victims.
2. The gist of the allegations against the petitioner(s) is that on 13.02.2021, the police recorded the statement of complainant (respondent No.2 herein) under Section 154 Cr.P.C., in the following terms:-
Shakuntala Sawhney v Kaushalya Sawhney
Ram Prasad v State of Uttar Pradesh
Suresh Babu v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Dimpey Gujraj v Union Territory
State of Rajasthan v. Shambhu Kewat
Narinder Singh &Ors. vs. State of Punjab &Ors. [(2014) 6 SCC 466]
State of Maharashtra vs. Vikram Anantrai Doshi
Parbatbhai Aahir v State of Gujarat
Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association v State of Himachal Pradesh
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.