Satpal vs State of Haryana - 2022 Supreme(P&H) 71

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(P&H) 71

ANOOP CHITKARA
Satpal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Mr. Ravinder Hooda.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajat Gautam, DAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
816	13.12.2017	City Sonipat District Sonipat	307, 323, 506, 34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act

AND

FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
382	11.05.2018	City Sonipat, District Sonipat	148, 149, 323, 324, 506 IPC

The petitioners who have been arraigned as accused in the cross cases against each other in the above captioned FIRs, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of their respective FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise qua each other.

2. The gist of the allegations is that due to some misunderstanding, scuffle took place in between both the parties and they received injuries. That is why both the parties made the complaint to the police.

3. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the injured have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-3 in both the petitions. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR qua each other and in the quashin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(P&H) 71

ANOOP CHITKARASatpal – AppellantVersusState of Haryana – Respondent

Cases Referred (13)

ANOOP CHITKARA
Satpal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent