ANOOP CHITKARA
Akashdeep Singh @ Ghughi – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anoop Chitkara, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 131 | 19.10.2021 | City Rampura, District Bathinda | 341, 323, 148 & 149 IPC (Sections 308 & 325 IPC added later on) |
1. The petitioners apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above have come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.
2. In Para 9 of the bail petition, the petitioners declare no criminal history. The petitioners did not disclose criminal antecedents in the petition; however, Ld. Counsel appearing for the petitioners states on instruction that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioners contend that the custodial investigation would serve no purpose whatsoever, and the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioners and family.
4. On instructions from ASI Jagtar Singh, learned State counsel opposed the bail.
REASONING:
5. The complainant alleged that when he was going on his bike then the accused persons attacked him and gave him beatings including his head. He attributed injuries upon a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.