ANOOP CHITKARA
Baljinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 18 | 10.03.2021 | Begowal, Kapurthala | 323, 324, 34, 295-A & 325 IPC and sections 3(1) of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act added later on |
| Criminal Case no. before trial Court | BA/2524/2021 decided on 23.12.2021 |
Aggrieved by the dismissal of his bail under section 438 CrPC, the accused has come up before this court by filing an appeal under section 14-A of Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, (SCSTPOA), seeking bail.
2. The appellant had filed a bail application before the Additional Sessions Judge, Kapurthala, which was dismissed on 23.12.2021.
3. In Prathvi Raj v. Union of India, AIR 2020 SC 1036, a three-judge bench of Supreme Court read down S. 18 by declaring as follows,
Prahlad Singh Bhati v. NCT, Delhi
State of Rajasthan v. Balchand
Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. Public Prosecutor
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Sumit Mehta v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.