SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 30

ANOOP CHITKARA
Baljinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Pushp Jain, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. H.S. Sitta, AAG

JUDGMENT :

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

18

10.03.2021

Begowal, Kapurthala

323, 324, 34, 295-A & 325 IPC and sections 3(1) of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act added later on

 

Criminal Case no. before trial Court

BA/2524/2021 decided on 23.12.2021

Aggrieved by the dismissal of his bail under section 438 CrPC, the accused has come up before this court by filing an appeal under section 14-A of Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, (SCSTPOA), seeking bail.

2. The appellant had filed a bail application before the Additional Sessions Judge, Kapurthala, which was dismissed on 23.12.2021.

3. In Prathvi Raj v. Union of India, AIR 2020 SC 1036, a three-judge bench of Supreme Court read down S. 18 by declaring as follows,

    [10]. Concerning the applicability of provisions of section 438 Cr.PC, it shall not apply to the cases under Act of 1989. However, if the complaint does not make out a prima facie case for applicability of the provisions of the Act of 1989, the bar created by section 18 and 18A (i) shall not appl

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top