IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Vikas Bahl, J.
Ajit Singh & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CRM-M-43647-2020
Decided On : 29-07-2022
Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Quashing of FIR - Indian Penal Code,1860 - 452, 324, 323, 34, 325, 326 - High Court allowed the quashing of FIR and subsequent proceedings based on the compromise between the parties. The court relied on the Full Bench judgment of the court in 'Kulwinder Singh and others Vs State of Punjab' and the Supreme Court's decision in 'Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another' to exercise its inherent power to secure the ends of justice and prevent the abuse of the process of law.
Fact of the Case:
The petition was filed for quashing of FIR and subsequent proceedings under various sections of the Indian Penal Code based on a compromise between the parties. The complainant, witnesses, and accused all submitted statements stating the voluntary nature of the compromise.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the matter had been amicably settled between the petitioners and the complainant and that quashing the FIR was necessary to secure the ends of justice. The court also noted that none of the petitioners were declared proclaimed offenders and were not involved in any other case.
Issues: The main issue was whether the court should exercise its power to quash the FIR and subsequent proceedings based on the compromise between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Full Bench judgment of the court in 'Kulwinder Singh and others Vs State of Punjab' and the Supreme Court's decision in 'Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another' to exercise its inherent power to quash the criminal proceedings in order to secure the ends of justice and prevent the abuse of the process of law.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the FIR and subsequent proceedings were ordered to be quashed, qua the petitioners.
JUDGMENT
Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral). - This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 115 dated 13.08.2020 under Sections 452, 324, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (Sections 325 and 326 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Makhu, District Ferozepur (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising on the basis of the compromise.
2. On 23.12.2020, a coordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order:-
'The case is taken up through video conferencing on account of COVID-19.
By filing this petition, quashing of FIR No. 115 dated 13.08.2020 under Sections 452, 324, 323 and 34 IPC (Sections 325 and 326 IPC added lateron) registered at Police Station Makhu, District Ferozepur and all other consequent proceedings arising therefrom has been sought on the basis of compromise.
Notice of motion.
Mr. Harpreet S. Multani, AAG, Punjab and Mr. Rahul Arora, Advocate accept notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State and respondents No. 2 to 4 respectively.
Parties may appear before concerned Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate on 08.01.2021 or on any other date convenient to the said Court and get their statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The original compromise shall be produced before the said Court. In the event of their statements being recorded, the Court will send copies of the same to this Court before the next date of hearing along with his report:
i) regarding genuineness and voluntary nature of the compromise;
ii) whether all the accused/petitioners are appearing before the Court or are on bail; and iii)whether any other proceeding is pending against the accused/petitioners.
Adjourned to 09.03.2021.
Sd/- 23.12.2020 (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) JUDGE'
3. In pursuance of the said order, a report has been submitted by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Zira to the Registrar General of this Court. The relevant portion of the said report is reproduced hereinbelow:-
'Thereafter complainant Sukhdev Singh son of Balwinder singh has suffered a statement that:-
'Stated that I have compromised the matter with all the accused. The compromise is voluntarily with free consent. Original compromise is hereby produced.
1. The compromise is genuine and voluntarily and out of free will of the parties.
2. There are three accused arraigned in the FIR and all the accused have appeared before the court and no accused is PO in this FIR.
3. No other proceeding against accused is pending in any court.
I have no objection if the present FIR is quashed against all the accused".
Thereafter victim/witnesses Palwinder Kaur and Basant Singh have suffered a joint statement that:
"Stated that we have compromised the matter with all the accused.
1. The compromise is voluntarily with free consent. The compromise is genuine and voluntarily and out of free will of the parties.
2. There are three accused arraigned in the FIR and all the accused have appeared before the court and no accused is PO in this FIR.
3. No other proceeding against accused is pending in any court.
We have no objection if the present FIR is quashed against all the accused".
Thereafter accused
1. Ajit Singh,
2. Satpal Singh,
3. Amritpal Singh;
have suffered a joint statement that:-
"Stated that We have compromised the matter with opposite party. The compromise is voluntarily with free consent. Original compromise is hereby produced.
1. The compromise is genuine and voluntarily and out of free will of the parties.
2. There are three accused arraigned in the FIR and all the accused have appeared before the court and no accused is PO in this FIR.
4....
3. The accused have not filed any bail application in any court till date nor accused are in custody.
5. No other proceeding against accused is pending in any court".
I am satisfied that the parties have suffered statement with free consent and without any coercion undue influence or fear.
The original statements of persons as mentioned above and original compromise are attached along with.
Rep
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings in order to secure the ends of justice and prevent the abuse of the process of law, even in cases of ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the wide plenitude of inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings in which a compromise has been effected, not confin....
The High Court has the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of Court.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the power of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings based on compromise to prevent abuse of the process of law and secure the ends of just....
The High Court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings to prevent the abuse of the process of law or to secure the ends of justice, not confined to matrimonial disputes alone.
The inherent power of the Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be used to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice.
The court established the principle that inherent power can be used to quash criminal proceedings where a compromise has been effected, in order to secure the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse ....
The High Court has the power to quash a criminal proceeding to prevent abuse of the process of law or to secure the ends of justice, considering the nature and gravity of the crime and the settlement....
The court has the power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings where a compromise has been effected, in order to prevent the abuse of the process of law and to secure the ends of ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.