SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 350

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Vikas Bahl, J.
Ajit Singh & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CRM-M-43647-2020
Decided On : 29-07-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Raman Goklaney, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, AAG, Punjab., Mr. Rahul Arora, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4, for the Respondent

The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings in order to secure the ends of justice and prevent the abuse of the process of law, even in cases of non-compoundable offences.

Headnote:

Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Quashing of FIR - Indian Penal Code,1860 - 452, 324, 323, 34, 325, 326 - High Court allowed the quashing of FIR and subsequent proceedings based on the compromise between the parties. The court relied on the Full Bench judgment of the court in 'Kulwinder Singh and others Vs State of Punjab' and the Supreme Court's decision in 'Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another' to exercise its inherent power to secure the ends of justice and prevent the abuse of the process of law.

Fact of the Case:

The petition was filed for quashing of FIR and subsequent proceedings under various sections of the Indian Penal Code based on a compromise between the parties. The complainant, witnesses, and accused all submitted statements stating the voluntary nature of the compromise.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the matter had been amicably settled between the petitioners and the complainant and that quashing the FIR was necessary to secure the ends of justice. The court also noted that none of the petitioners were declared proclaimed offenders and were not involved in any other case.

Issues: The main issue was whether the court should exercise its power to quash the FIR and subsequent proceedings based on the compromise between the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Full Bench judgment of the court in 'Kulwinder Singh and others Vs State of Punjab' and the Supreme Court's decision in 'Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another' to exercise its inherent power to quash the criminal proceedings in order to secure the ends of justice and prevent the abuse of the process of law.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the FIR and subsequent proceedings were ordered to be quashed, qua the petitioners.

JUDGMENT

Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral). - This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 115 dated 13.08.2020 under Sections 452, 324, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (Sections 325 and 326 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Makhu, District Ferozepur (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising on the basis of the compromise.

2. On 23.12.2020, a coordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order:-

      'The case is taken up through video conferencing on account of COVID-19.

      By filing this petition, quashing of FIR No. 115 dated 13.08.2020 under Sections 452, 324, 323 and 34 IPC (Sections 325 and 326 IPC added lateron) registered at Police Station Makhu, District Ferozepur and all other consequent proceedings arising therefrom has been sought on the basis of compromise.

      Notice of motion.

      Mr. Harpreet S. Multani, AAG, Punjab and Mr. Rahul Arora, Advocate accept notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State and respondents No. 2 to 4 respectively.

      Parties may appear before concerned Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate on 08.01.2021 or on any other date convenient to the said Court and get their statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The original compromise shall be produced before the said Court. In the event of their statements being recorded, the Court will send copies of the same to this Court before the next date of hearing along with his report:

      i) regarding genuineness and voluntary nature of the compromise;

      ii) whether all the accused/petitioners are appearing before the Court or are on bail; and iii)whether any other proceeding is pending against the accused/petitioners.

      Adjourned to 09.03.2021.

      Sd/- 23.12.2020 (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) JUDGE'

      3. In pursuance of the said order, a report has been submitted by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Zira to the Registrar General of this Court. The relevant portion of the said report is reproduced hereinbelow:-

          'Thereafter complainant Sukhdev Singh son of Balwinder singh has suffered a statement that:-

          'Stated that I have compromised the matter with all the accused. The compromise is voluntarily with free consent. Original compromise is hereby produced.

          1. The compromise is genuine and voluntarily and out of free will of the parties.

          2. There are three accused arraigned in the FIR and all the accused have appeared before the court and no accused is PO in this FIR.

          3. No other proceeding against accused is pending in any court.

          I have no objection if the present FIR is quashed against all the accused".

          Thereafter victim/witnesses Palwinder Kaur and Basant Singh have suffered a joint statement that:

          "Stated that we have compromised the matter with all the accused.

          1. The compromise is voluntarily with free consent. The compromise is genuine and voluntarily and out of free will of the parties.

          2. There are three accused arraigned in the FIR and all the accused have appeared before the court and no accused is PO in this FIR.

          3. No other proceeding against accused is pending in any court.

          We have no objection if the present FIR is quashed against all the accused".

          Thereafter accused

          1. Ajit Singh,

          2. Satpal Singh,

          3. Amritpal Singh;

          have suffered a joint statement that:-

          "Stated that We have compromised the matter with opposite party. The compromise is voluntarily with free consent. Original compromise is hereby produced.

          1. The compromise is genuine and voluntarily and out of free will of the parties.

          2. There are three accused arraigned in the FIR and all the accused have appeared before the court and no accused is PO in this FIR.

          4....

          3. The accused have not filed any bail application in any court till date nor accused are in custody.

          5. No other proceeding against accused is pending in any court".

          I am satisfied that the parties have suffered statement with free consent and without any coercion undue influence or fear.

          The original statements of persons as mentioned above and original compromise are attached along with.

          Rep

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top