SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 131

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.
Gulam Deen & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CRWP -5744 of 2022
Decided On : 13-06-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate, for the Appellant.

The court emphasized the protection of fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, particularly in the context of marriage and the apprehension of danger to life and liberty.

Headnote:

Muslim Personal Law - Marriage - Protection of Life and Liberty

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, both Muslims, married against the wishes of their family members and sought protection from private respondents who posed a threat to their life and liberty.

Finding of the Court:

The court acknowledged the validity of the petitioners' marriage under Muslim Personal Law and emphasized the need to address the petitioners' apprehension for their safety and liberty, in line with Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Issues: Validity of the marriage, protection of life and liberty, and the court's jurisdiction to address the petitioners' apprehension.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the marriage of a Muslim girl is governed by Muslim Personal Law, and as both petitioners were of marriageable age, their marriage was valid. The court emphasized the need to protect the fundamental rights of the petitioners, as per Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Final Decision: The court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police to decide the petitioners' representation and take necessary action, without affecting any other civil or criminal proceedings.

JUDGMENT

Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. (Oral). - This is a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent Nos.2 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondent Nos. 5 to 7.

2. In the present case, both the petitioners are Muslims. They fell in love some time ago and decided to perform marriage. The date of birth of petitioner No.l is 14.05.2001 and that of petitioner No.2 is 01.01.2006 as per their Aadhar Cards, which have been annexed with the petition as Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively. Both the petitioners have solemnized their marriage on 08.06.2022 as per Muslim rites and ceremonies.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that this is the first marriage of both the petitioners. He has relied upon the decisions by this Court in Kammu vs. State of Haryana & Ors [2010(4) RCR (Civil) 716]; "Yunus Khan vs. State of Haryana & Ors.' [2014(3) RCR (Criminal) 518] and "Mohd. Santini w. State of Haryana & Ors [2019(1) RCR (Criminal) 685] to contend that in Muslim law puberty and majority are one and the same and that there is a presumption that a person attains majority at the age of 15 years. It is further contented that a Muslim boy or Muslim girl who has attained puberty is at liberty to marry any one he or she likes and the guardian has no right to interfere.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the life and liberty of the petitioners is in grave danger at the hands of respondent Nos. 5 to 7. It is further contended that the petitioners have also moved a representation dated 09.06.2022 (Annexure P-4) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot (respondent No.2). However, no action has been taken thereon. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he limits his prayer in the present petition and would be satisfied at this stage if directions are issued for deciding the said representation (Annexure P-4) in a time-bound manner in accordance with law.

5. Notice of motion.

6. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Bhupender Beniwal, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.l to 4.

7. This Court has taken note of the judgements cited on behalf of the petitioners and also the fact that the girl in the instant case i.e. petitioner No.2 is aged more than 16 years. In the case of Yunus Khan(supra) it has been noted that the marriage of a Muslim girl is governed by the personal law of the Muslims. Article 195 from the book 'Principles of Mohammedan Law by Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mulla' has also been reproduced in the said decision which Article reads as under :

    195. Capacity for marriage - (1) Every Mahomedan of sound mind, who has attained puberty, may enter into a contract of marriage.

    (2) Lunatics and minors who have not attained puberty may be validly contracted in marriage by their respective guardians.

    (3) A marriage of a Mahomedan who is sound mind and has attained puberty, is void, if it is brought about without his consent.

    Explanation - Puberty is presum ed, in the absence of eviden ce, on completion of the age offifteen years.

    8. The law, as laid down in various judgments cited above, is clear that the marriage of a Muslim girl is governed by the Muslim Personal Law. As per Article 195 from the book 'Principles of Mohammedan Law by Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mulla', the petitioner No.2 being over 16 years of age was competent to enter into a contract of marriage with a person of her choice. Petitioner No.l is stated to be more than 21 years of age. Thus, both the petitioners are of marriageable age as envisaged by Muslim Personal Law. In any event, the issue in hand is not with regard to the validity of the marriage but to address the apprehension raised by the petitioners of danger to their life and liberty at the hands of the private respondents and to provide them protection as envisaged under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Article 21 of the Constitution of

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top