SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 191

ALKA SARIN
Phool Singh – Appellant
Versus
Amit Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Alka Sarin, J. - The present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the impugned orders dated 05.04.2022 and 08.03.2022 passed by the Courts below dismissing the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed by the plaintiff-petitioners herein.

2. The brief facts relevant to the present Us are that the plaintiff-petitioners filed a suit for permanent injunction averring therein that they were the owners in possession of Residential Plot No.2 measuring 394 sq. yards comprised in Killa No.216//10/1, 11, 12, 20, 22 min, Mauja Garhi Bohar, Tehsil and District Rohtak. It was further averred that the plaintiff-petitioner No.l had paid an amount of Rs. 15 lakhs on 27.08.2013 and an amount of Rs.20 lakhs on 25.10.2013 to one Wazir Chand who had thereafter executed a written agreement to sell in their favour on 03.09.2015 for a total sale consideration of Rs.66,98,000/- which included Rs.35 lakhs as mentioned above. It was further averred that the said Wazir Chand handed over possession to the plaintiff-petitioners and the plaintiff-petitioners had constructed a boundary wall on the plot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top