IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Raj Mohan Singh, J.
Ritin Khanna & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CWP No.22321 of 2020(O&M) with CWP No.21103 of 2020(O&M) with CWP No.4803 of 2020(O&M) with CWP No.1806 of 2020(O&M)
Decided On : 19-04-2022
Election - Punjab Badminton Association - Order 1 Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 CPC read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Rules 21 and 22 of writ jurisdiction (Punjab and Haryana) Rules, 1976 - 30.11.2020, 08.03.2019, 30.10.2020, 18.11.2020, 10.12.2020 - The court allowed the application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) and impleaded Ritin Khanna and Daya Shanker Kumaria as party respondents No.6 and 7 in the writ petition. The main cases involved various petitions seeking writs, orders, and directions related to the election of the Punjab Badminton Association. The court found that the tenure of the previous administration had expired, and elections were repeatedly postponed. The court noted that the elections were held as per the directions issued by the High Court and that the aggrieved party may resort to legal proceedings in accordance with the law after the declaration of the election results. The court directed the old office bearers to give way to the newly constituted Governing Body, which would take over the management and affairs of Punjab Badminton Association. The newly constituted Governing Body was directed to take charge over the affairs of Punjab Badminton Association, rendering the need for an Ad-hoc Committee unnecessary. The court also disposed of a petition related to the Masters Punjab State Badminton Championships 2019-20, as the championship had already been held.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved various petitions seeking writs, orders, and directions related to the election of the Punjab Badminton Association. The tenure of the previous administration had expired, and elections were repeatedly postponed. The court noted that the elections were held as per the directions issued by the High Court and that the aggrieved party may resort to legal proceedings in accordance with the law after the declaration of the election results.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the elections were held as per the directions issued by the High Court and that the aggrieved party may resort to legal proceedings in accordance with the law after the declaration of the election results. The court directed the old office bearers to give way to the newly constituted Governing Body, which would take over the management and affairs of Punjab Badminton Association. The newly constituted Governing Body was directed to take charge over the affairs of Punjab Badminton Association, rendering the need for an Ad-hoc Committee unnecessary.
Issues: The main issues involved the validity of the election process, the expiration of the tenure of the previous administration, and the repeated postponement of elections.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the elections were held as per the directions issued by the High Court and that the aggrieved party may resort to legal proceedings in accordance with the law after the declaration of the election results. The court directed the old office bearers to give way to the newly constituted Governing Body, which would take over the management and affairs of Punjab Badminton Association. The newly constituted Governing Body was directed to take charge over the affairs of Punjab Badminton Association, rendering the need for an Ad-hoc Committee unnecessary.
Final Decision: The court allowed the application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) and impleaded Ritin Khanna and Daya Shanker Kumaria as party respondents No.6 and 7 in the writ petition. The court directed the old office bearers to give way to the newly constituted Governing Body, which would take over the management and affairs of Punjab Badminton Association. The newly constituted Governing Body was directed to take charge over the affairs of Punjab Badminton Association, rendering the need for an Ad-hoc Committee unnecessary. The court also disposed of a petition related to the Masters Punjab State Badminton Championships 2019-20, as the championship had already been held.
JUDGMENT
Raj Mohan Singh, J. - CM No.218-CWP of 2021 in CWP No.21103 of 2020
This is an application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 CPC read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Rules 21 and 22 of writ jurisdiction (Punjab and Haryana) Rules, 1976 for impleading Ritin Khanna and Daya Shanker Kumaria as party respondents No.6 and 7 respectively in the writ petition.
Notice of this application was issued to the nonapplicant/petitioner on 25.01.2021.
Reply to the application was filed by the petitioner.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in order to consider the controversy in its large spectrum, I deem it appropriate to implead the aforesaid persons as party respondents No.6 and 7 in the writ petition and also consider the written statement filed by them for disposal of the present case as well as connected cases.
Application stands allowed.
Main cases
1. Vide this common order, CWP No.22321 of 2020 titled Ritin Khanna and others Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No.21103 of 2020 titled Tejinder Singh Walia and another Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No.4803 of 2020 tilted Sandeep Singh Saini and others Vs. State of Punjab and others and CWP No.1806 of 2020 titled Pathankot District Badminton Association Vs. Union of India and others are being disposed of. Common facts are being noticed.
2. In CWP No.22321 of 2020, prayer is for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, especially in the nature of mandamus, directing the official respondents to take appropriate action against the parallel election process being carried out by the private respondents as the same is in contravention of order dated 30.11.2020 passed by respondent No.2/Principal Secretary, Department of Sports and Youth Services, Government of Punjab, whereby in view of long delay in holding of the fresh elections after expiry of term of the previous administration on 23.06.2019, a three- members committee, consisting of members from Indian Administrative Services was formed to ensure that the elections to the Punjab Badminton Association are held within a period of three months in furtherance of which, the said Committee appointed several members from Punjab Civil Services as Election Officers to prepare the schedule of the election and to conduct the same in a free and fair manner and further, all 19 District Badminton Associations have participated in the said elections as is apparent from letters dated 21.11.2020, 20.11.2020 and 19.11.2020 addressed by them to respondent No.6 (Election Officer-cum-Additional Deputy Commissioner), whereas the parallel election process was being carried out by the private respondents secretly without any authority in order to illegally and arbitrarily usurp the decision making powers of the Punjab Badminton Association by defeating the directions issued vide order dated 30.10.2020. This is further supported by the fact that the members of 14 out of 19 District Badminton Associations have categorically condemned illegal parallel election process vide letter dated 14.12.2020 and have further refused to participate in the same and have expressed their satisfaction with the previous elections, which were held in accordance with the order dated 30.10.2020. Further a writ in the nature of certiorari is also prayed for setting aside the circulars/letters/minutes dated 19.11.2020, 15.10.2020, 19.02.2020 and 11.08.2019 being in violation of provisions of Memorandum of Punjab Badminton Association, Memorandum of Badminton Association of India, National Sports Code and also the order dated 30.10.2020. Further a writ in the nature of mandamus is also sought, directing the official respondents to form an Ad-hoc Committee consisting of high ranking and responsible members of the Badminton Association of India to administer the affair and functioning of respondent No.8 as the tenure of previous association has expired on 23.06.2019. Directions are also sought for deciding the representation (Anne
Election Commission of India vs. Ashok Kumar (2000) 8 SCC 216
Mohinder Singh Gill vs. Chief Election Commr. (1978) 1 SCC 405.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that once the elections are held as per the directions issued by the High Court, the aggrieved party may resort to legal proceedings in accordance ....
Interference in electoral matters after results are declared is barred by Articles 243-O and 243-ZG; the appropriate recourse is through an election petition.
A writ petition is not maintainable to challenge an order of rejection of nomination paper by the Returning Officer/competent authority having regard to the provisions in Article 243-O of the Constit....
A dispute arising among the members of a society registered under the A.P. Societies Registration Act, 2001, relating to the affairs of the society, is to be resolved through the mechanism provided u....
Election disputes within registered societies must be resolved in civil courts, and adherence to the society's bylaws is essential for the conduct of elections.
The election of the Chairman of Panchayat Samiti was declared null and void due to procedural irregularities regarding the reservation for women, affirming the necessity of compliance with election r....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.