RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Ritin Khanna – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Raj Mohan Singh, J. - CM No.218-CWP of 2021 in CWP No.21103 of 2020
This is an application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 CPC read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Rules 21 and 22 of writ jurisdiction (Punjab and Haryana) Rules, 1976 for impleading Ritin Khanna and Daya Shanker Kumaria as party respondents No.6 and 7 respectively in the writ petition.
Notice of this application was issued to the nonapplicant/petitioner on 25.01.2021.
Reply to the application was filed by the petitioner.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in order to consider the controversy in its large spectrum, I deem it appropriate to implead the aforesaid persons as party respondents No.6 and 7 in the writ petition and also consider the written statement filed by them for disposal of the present case as well as connected cases.
Application stands allowed.
Main cases
1. Vide this common order, CWP No.22321 of 2020 titled Ritin Khanna and others Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No.21103 of 2020 titled Tejinder Singh Walia and another Vs. State of Punjab and others, CWP No.4803 of 2020 tilted Sandeep Singh Saini and others Vs. State of Punjab and others and CWP No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.