SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 382

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harsimran Singh Sethi, J.
Swaran Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-20393-2016
Decided On : 04-04-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. A.S. Narang, Advocate, for the Appellant, Mr. Kanisth Ganeriwala, Aag, Punjab, for the Respondent.

Entitlement of dependent parents for family pension after the widow becomes ineligible.

Headnote:

family pension - entitlement of dependent parents - Rule governing the service of the deceased - ii) Parents who were wholly dependent on the Government employee when he/she was alive provided that the deceased employee had left behind neither a widow nor a child. The parents whose total income from all sources was Rs.2620/- per mensem or more at the time of death of the employee shall not be considered to be dependent.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, mother of the deceased, filed a petition seeking family pension after the widow of the deceased got re-married and became ineligible for the grant of family pension.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the widowed mother, being the only claimant of the family pension after the widow's re-marriage, is entitled to the grant of family pension from the date of the widow's re-marriage in December, 2008.

Issues: Entitlement of dependent parents for family pension after the widow becomes ineligible.

Ratio Decidendi: The entitlement for the grant of family pension to the dependent parents needs to be seen after the widow or the children lose their eligibility for the grant of the said benefit.

Final Decision: The widowed mother is held entitled for the grant of family pension from the date of the widow's re-marriage in December, 2008. The computation of the family pension and respective arrears to be released to the petitioner within two months.

ORDER

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral). - The present petition has been filed for the grant of family to the petitioner, who is the mother of the deceased.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the son of the petitioner, namely Satnam Singh, was employed with respondent No.2, i.e. the Punjab Armed Police. He was married and was having a son and the petitioner, i.e the mother of Satnam Singh, who is a widow, was dependent upon his son. Unfortunately in a car accident on 04.06.2006, Satnam Singh as well as his son died. Thereafter keeping in view the rules governing the service of Satnam Singh, his widow was found eligible for the grant of family pension. As per the said rules, in case the widow re-marries, she looses her right for the grant of family pension. In the present case, it is a conceded position that on 02.12.2008, widow of Satnam Singh, i.e. respondent No.5, got re-married to one Makhan Singh and since then she is residing with her second husband. Therefore after 2008, the petitioner became the lone survivor of the family and claimant for the grant of family pension. Though upon filing the application by the petitioner for the grant of family pension, her case was initiated by the authorities concerned but the same was never finalized. Ultimately, the respondents concluded that the rules governing the service of the deceased, namely Satnam Singh, explicitly does not grant the benefit of family pension to the mother, after once the family pension has already been extended to the widow, and the claim of the petitioner for the grant of family pension was not accepted, which has led the petitioner to file the present petition.

3. Upon notice of motion, the respondents have filed a reply, wherein they have stated that keeping in view the rules governing the service of the deceased-Satnam Singh, the family pension is to be extended initially to the widow of the deceased in exclusion of everyone else and if the widow becomes ineligible for grant of the same, the grant of family pension is extended to the children of the deceased in exclusion of everyone else. The respondents have further mentioned that though the parents of the deceased are also entitled for the grant of family pension, in case they are dependent upon the deceased, but the said benefit can only be extended to them, in case the deceased did not leave behind either a widow or any child and the total income of the parents, from all sources, does not exceed Rs.2,620/- per month. Learned State counsel submits that as in the present case, the widow of deceased-Satnam Singh was granted the benefit of family pension from the year 2006 to 2008, but after she got re-married, the family pension was stopped, hence keeping in view the terms and conditions of this case, the petitioner cannot be treated to be eligible for the grant of the family pension keeping in view the rules governing the service of the deceased.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record with their able assistance.

5. The family pension is to be allowed to the dependent so as to mitigate the financial hardships of the family. The rules governing the service of the deceased are to be adhered to while examining the eligibility/entitlement of the family left behind by the deceased. Concededly in the present case, the rules governing the service of the deceased-Satnam Singh for the grant of family pension is tagged by the respondents along with their reply (Annexure R-1), which is to be taken into consideration for the grant of family pension to the petitioner. The said rule is as under:-

    ' - x - x -

    ii) Parents who were wholly dependent on the Government employee when he/she was alive provided that the deceased employee had left behind neither a widow nor a child. The parents whose total income from all sources was Rs.2620/- per mensem or more at the time of death of the employee shall not be considered to be dependent."

    6. A bare perusal of the above would sho

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top