ANOOP CHITKARA
Gurjant Singh @ Sonu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
Complaint No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
22 as well as summoning order | 05.07.2017/ 06.03.2019 | Beas, Amritsar | 326/324/325/323/341/506/148/149 IPC |
1. The petitioners arraigned as accused in the above captioned complaint, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the Complaint alongwith summoning order dated 06.03.2019 and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the victim.
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the injured have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-3.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the complaint, and in the quashing petition, the injured has been impleaded as respondent No.2.
4. On 11-3-2022, the victim/complainant Nishanjot Singh, respondent no. 2 stated before the JMIC, Baba Bakala Sahib that there would be no objection if the court quashes this complaint and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 15-3-2022, the parties consented to the quashing of complaint and consequent proceedings without any threat.
ANALYSIS & REASONING:
5. Despite the severe opposition of the State's counsel to
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab
Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association v State of Himachal Pradesh
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs Laxmi Narayan (2019) 5 SCC 688
Narinder Singh &Ors. vs. State of Punjab &Ors. (2014) 6 SCC 466, ¦ 29
Parbatbhai Aahir v State of Gujarat
Recent Apex Judgments (R.A.J.) 549 : (2012)10 SCC 303
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.