Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Hardeep Singh @ Cock – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
163 | 14.12.2018 | Bareta, District Mansa | 452, 323, 427, 506, 148, 149 IPC |
1. The petitioner(s), arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the victim(s).
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the victim(s) have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition. After that, the petitioner(s) came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the victim(s) have been impleaded as respondent(s).
3. On the prayer of the parties in the present petition, the Court had permitted the parties to appear before the concerned Court to record their statements. As per the concerned Court's report dated 14.01.2022, the victim(s), without any threat, consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings.
4. On 12.01.2022, the victims/complainant Chamkaur Singh and Karnail Kaur, respondents nos. 2 & 3 stated before the JMIC Budhlada that they have no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings.
ANALYSIS & REASONING:
5. The
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the exercise of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC is justified to quash the FIR and consequent proceedings when the compromise is voluntar....
The court can invoke its inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences based on judicial precedents and the ends of justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to invoke inherent powers under section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences based on a voluntary settlement between t....
The main legal point established is that the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C can be used to quash proceedings based on a compromise, even for non-compoundable offences, if it serves the ends ....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash criminal proceedings based on a settlement between the parties, even if ....
The inherent power under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to quash a criminal proceeding based on a settlement between the offender and the victim, even if the offence is non-compoundable, to preven....
The Court can invoke its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences if the settlement is genuine and the continuation of the proceedings serves no fruitful purpose, cons....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the exercise of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC can be justified to prevent abuse of the process of law and secure the ends of justice, ....
The Court's decision highlights the exercise of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences based on a voluntary settlement and the absence of impact on public peace and ....
The court can invoke the inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC to quash non-compoundable offences if the settlement is voluntary and in the interest of justice, considering the impact on publi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
