IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.
Bijender – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
CRR-133 of 2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 04-03-2022
Rash and Negligent Driving - Criminal Law - Sections 279, 337, 338, 304-A IPC - The court discussed the evidence and interpretation of the provisions under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code. The court emphasized the importance of eyewitness testimony, medical reports, and the circumstances of the case in establishing the accused's guilt. The judgment relied on precedents to support the finding of rash and negligent driving by the accused.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a fatal accident caused by the rash and negligent driving of the accused, resulting in the death of one individual and injuries to another.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the accused guilty based on the eyewitness testimony, medical reports, and the circumstances of the case, concluding that the accused was driving the offending vehicle in a rash and negligent manner.
Issues: The key issues included the identification of the accused, the presence of eyewitnesses at the accident spot, and the evidence of rash and negligent driving.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the eyewitness testimony, medical reports, and the circumstances of the case to establish the accused's guilt of rash and negligent driving, emphasizing the importance of these factors in determining the verdict.
Final Decision: The revision petition was dismissed, and the sentence was modified to 1-1/2 years based on the accused being a first-time offender and the occurrence being almost 10 years old.
JUDGMENT
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. - The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 15.12.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar vide which the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.11.2018 and 30.11.2018 passed by Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bahadurgarh, has been dismissed.
2. Briefly, the present case was got lodged on the statement of Sunil Kumar son of Rajpal to the effect that on 22.12.2013, he was coming from Bahadurgarh to his village Chhara in his vehicle bearing registration No.HR-13E-8500 make Mahindra Logan. One motor cycle CD Delux bearing registration No.HR-13E-5867 was going in front of his vehicle near Rewari Kheda Turn, which was driven by his co-villager Vicky and Dinesh was the pillion rider. At about 3.30 PM, when they reached on Rewari Kheda Mod, an Eicher Canter being driven in a rash and negligent manner by its driver came from the side of Bahadurgarh without blowing the horn or giving an indicator and hit the motor cycle from the back. Due to this, Dinesh and Vicky fell down on the road along with the motor cycle and sustained multiple injuries. The registration number of the offending vehicle was HR-63B-4119 and the driver disclosed his name as Bijender son of Jagbir Singh. Many people gathered on the spot and when he was holding Dinesh and Vicky the driver of the Canter fled away from there. Thereafter, he took Dinesh to GH Jhajjar, where he was declared dead by the doctor and Vicky was taken to PGIMS, Rohtak by his family members. The said accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the offending canter, Hence, legal action may be taken against him.
3. On the basis of above facts, FIR No.642 dated 22.12.2013 under Section 279, 337 and 304-A IPC P.S. Sadar Bahadurgarh was lodged. After registration of the case, investigation was set into moti on and after collecting sufficient evidence, the accused was arrested. After completion of the investigation, challan was prepared and presented before the Court, copy of which was supplied to the accused free of costs as envisaged under Section 207 Cr.PC.
4. After having heard the accused on charge, the then learned JMIC, Bahadurgarh, found a prima facie case punishable under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304-A of IPC made out against the accused and he was charge sheeted accordingly, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
5. In order to prove its case the prosecution examined as many as ten witnesses.
PW-1 : Pawan son of Sultan Singh, identified the dead body of deceased Dinesh.
PW-2 : Sunil Kumar (complainant) proved the contents of his complaint Ex.PW-2/A
PW-3 : Vikas @ Vicky (eye witness), witnessed the accident and supported the version of the complainant and proved the memo Ex.PW-3/A vide which motor cycle, registration certificate, photocopy of admission card and discharge card and his driving licence were taken into police possession.
PW-4 : SI Ramesh Kumar, (investigating Officer) proved the complaint Ex.PW-2/A, tehrir Ex.PW-4/A, FIR Ex.PW-4/B, endorsement on tehrir Ex.PW-4/C, death report of deceased Dinesh Ex.PW-4/D, site plan Ex.PW-4/E, recovery memo of offending canter Ex.PW-4/F, photographs of place of occurrence and offending vehicle Ex.PW-4/G to Ex.PW-4/J, memo vide which driving licence of accused and insurance papers of offender canter were taken into possession Ex.PW-4/K.
PW-5 : Dr. Sameer Minocha, tender his affidavit Ex.PW-5/A and proved the copy of postmortem report of deceased Dinesh as Ex.PW-5/B.
PW-6 : Ramphal, brought the summoned record and proved the medical file Ex.PW-6/A of injured Vikas.
PW-7 : EHC Raj pal, proved the recovery memo of papers of the motor cycle and driving licence of injured as Ex.PW-4/C and recovery memo of offending canter Ex.PW-4/F.
PW-8 : EASI Bal Kishan, proved the mechanical examination report of motor cycle as Ex.PW-8/B and of canter bearing No.Ex.PW-8/A.
PW-9 : Narender Sin
Bir Chand vs. State of Haryana 2003(3) RCR(Cri) 451
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's reliance on eyewitness testimonies and material evidence to establish the accused's guilt for rash and negligent driving under Sections....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the concept of negligence in determining liability for rash and negligent driving, as well as the consideration of legal precede....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principles of rash and negligent driving, valid identification of the accused, and the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in dete....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the culpability of the accused for driving in a rash and negligent manner, leading to the death of the victim, and the application of legal princip....
Negligence in driving leading to fatality can be established without a test identification parade if the identity is corroborated by credible witnesses.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on consistent and corroborative evidence of eye witnesses to prove the charges of rash and negligent driving, and the application of s....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.