SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 749

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Vikas Bahl, J.
Jaswant Singh @ Nanni - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M-51692-2021
Decided On : 13-09-2022

Advocates:
Mr. Mandeep Singla, Advocate for the petitioner., for the Appellant; Mr. Ramdeep Partap Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab., for the Respondent

The recovery of contraband from a transparent polythene bag raised doubts about conscious possession, and the legal principles related to bail under Section 37 of the Act of 1985 were considered in granting regular bail to the petitioner.

Headnote:

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Regular Bail - Section 22 - 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and referred to various judgments related to recovery of contraband in transparent polythene bags. The court also highlighted the legal principles related to bail under Section 37 of the Act of 1985 and cited several judgments from the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the High Court.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought regular bail in a case registered under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The petitioner argued that the recovery of contraband from a transparent polythene bag raised doubts about conscious possession. The State opposed the bail, claiming that the petitioner was caught red-handed with the contraband.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the recovery of contraband from a transparent polythene bag and cited previous judgments where bail was granted in similar cases. The court also discussed the legal principles related to bail under Section 37 of the Act of 1985 and granted the petitioner regular bail with specific conditions.

Issues: The issues involved the recovery of contraband from a transparent polythene bag, conscious possession, and the application of Section 37 of the Act of 1985 for granting bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on previous judgments where recovery from transparent polythene bags raised doubts about conscious possession and considered the legal principles related to bail under Section 37 of the Act of 1985.

Final Decision: The court granted the petitioner regular bail with specific conditions, considering the recovery of contraband from a transparent polythene bag and the legal principles related to bail under Section 37 of the Act of 1985.

JUDGMENT

Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral) - Prayer in the present petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.178 dated 29.07.2021 registered under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act of 1985') at Police Station City South Moga, District Moga.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 29.07.2021 and the investigation is complete and challan has been presented and there are 11 prosecution witnesses, out of which, none have been examined as yet and thus, the conclusion of trial is likely to take time. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not involved in any other case. On merits, it has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as per the prosecution case, the petitioner on seeing the police party, threw a transparent polythene bag and started turning towards the street and was thereafter, apprehended. It is further argued that a perusal of report (Annexure P-3) under Section 173 of Cr.P.C. would show that the said bag had been picked up from the ground by SI Balwinder Singh. It is argued that it has been repeatedly held by Coordinate Benches of this Court that it is highly unlikely for a person who has to carry contraband, to carry the same in a transparent polythene bag and on the basis of the said point alone, the Coordinate Benches of this Court have granted the concession of bail to the accused persons in such cases. Reference has been made to the various orders passed by the Coordinate Benches of this Court i.e. order dated 02.08.2021 passed in CRM-M-4408-2021 titled Banti Kaur @ Bhanti Kaur Vs. State of Punjab, Binder Kaur @ Goga Vs. State of Punjab reported as 2021(3) RCR (Criminal) 360, Jaskaran Singh @ Jassu Vs. State of Punjab, reported as 2021(2) RCR (Criminal) 837, order dated 28.02.2020 passed in CRM-M- 8026-2020 titled as Lakhwinder Singh @ Lakha Vs. State of Punjab.

3. It is further contended that the question whether the recovery effected from the ground has been effected from the conscious possession of the petitioner or not in the present case, is also a debatable issue and on the said aspect, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon a judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in Ravi Kumar Vs. State of Punjab, reported as 2019(4) RCR (Criminal) 714.

4. On the other hand, learned State Counsel has opposed the present petition for grant of regular bail to the petitioner and has submitted that the petitioner had thrown the transparent polythene bag containing the contraband in the presence of the police officials and thus, it cannot be said that the recovery effected from the petitioner is not from his conscious possession.

5. This Court has heard the learned counsel for the parties and has perused the paper book. A Coordinate Bench of this Court in Banti Kaur @ Bhanti Kaur's case (Supra) has held as under:-

    '1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of regular bail in respect of a case registered against her vide FIR No.191, dated 8.10.2020, Police Station Cantt Bathinda, District Bathinda, under Section 22 of NDPS Act, wherein it is alleged that the petitioner was caught red- handed while carrying a transparent plastic polythene bag which was found to contain 1000 tablets of 'Clovidol'.

    2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the instant case and that she has an unblemished record and is not involved in any other case and it is highly unlikely that any person who is carrying contraband would carry the same in a transparent bag so as to invite attention, including that the police.

    3. Opposing the petition, learned State counsel has not disputed the fact that the contraband is alleged to have been carried in a transparent plastic polythene bag. He has however, submitted that the weight of the total recovered contraband works out to 410 grams of 'Tramadol' which would

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon Back to top