VIKAS BAHL
Babita – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral) - This order will dispose of two petitions. The first petition has been filed by petitioner-Babita i.e. CRM-M-17111-2022 and the second petition has been filed by petitioner-Anjali i.e.,
CRM-M-17119-2022.
2. Both the said petitions have been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the grant of regular bail to the petitioners in FIR No.560 dated 22.09.2021, under Sections 306 and 34 IPC (Section 506 IPC has been added later on), at Police Station Kundli, District Sonipat.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioner-Babita is the mother-in-law of the deceased Vipan and petitioner-Anjali is the wife of the said Vipan. It is further submitted that both the petitioners are in custody since 12.10.2021 and the challan has already been presented and there are 21 prosecution witnesses, none of whom have been examined. It is also submitted that in the present case, neither there is any suicide note, nor any dying declaration and the present FIR has been registered at the instance of father of the deceased and a perusal of the FIR would show that no offence under Section 306 IPC is made out, inasmuch as, the only allegation levelled in the FIR
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.